discover how our capabilities can improve your business
Teaser Image
christian underware

Christian Underware

Christian Underwear

 
Christian Underwear

Can you believe this.  This … is the result of idol worshiping.

Former Presidential runner Romney wears it!  See the outline of his underwear under his white shirt.

Romney with underwareRomney underwear

These underwear garments are considered so sacred.  They contain small symbols.  This underwear is worn by faithful adult Mormons who’ve received certain ordinances in one of the church’s temples (which are different from the churches Mormons attend on Sundays).

By putting on what Mormons call “the whole armor of God” they believe that they are protected from temptation.  There are common stories of people who believe they were protected from physical injury because they wore this underwear.

Elder Carlos E. Asay, a high-ranking church official, explained the garment like this: “It is given to remind wearers of the continuing need for repentance, the need to honor binding covenants made in the house of the Lord, and the need to cherish and share virtue in our daily living so that promised blessings may be claimed.”

 

mormon temple underwear

Mormon underwear

Teaser Image
shrouds of Turin

Shroud(s) of Turin

Shroud(s) of Turin

 
Shroud(s) of Turin

shroud of turin

Notice how Jesus covers his groin.  How appropriate.

The image was found to have paint particles. 

Carbon 14 dating placed the cloth being from the 14th century.

Incidentally there are 26 “authentic” shrouds of Turin in Europe.

This shroud contradicts the New Testament Gospel accounts of way Jesus is described to be wrapped with multiple cloths and a napkin placed over his face.

turin face

Pope and shroudjesus simulationjesus position

The iconic Shroud of Turin is a 14-foot linen cloth bearing front & back images of a severely beaten and crucified man who stood 5' 10" (tall for that era). It is believed by the faithful to be the actual burial shroud of Jesus Christ. In the West, it was first presented to a local church during the 1350s by a French knight. There is no record of where the shroud was during the 1300 years since Christ’s burial outside Jerusalem -- though the best theory (based on forensic analysis of pollen particles from the shroud) would be that it was kept in Constantinople until the Catholic army's "4th Crusade" sack of the Eastern Orthodox city -- and before that, located in Jerusalem.

Worried that the shroud could turn out to be fake, the official position of Pope Clement VII and the Catholic Church at that time was to declare it to be an artistic relic, but not a holy icon -- a fact which debunkers will often cite, but which fails to take into account the fact no one then, nor to this day, has been able to explain how the haunting image and blood stains got into the fabric.

In 1532, a fire broke out (or was set?) in the chapel where the shroud had been moved to. It melted part of the silver in the container housing the shroud -- dripping molten metal on the sides of the cloth. Some of the damaged area was replaced and stitched together by nuns, but the burn marks and the extinguishing water stains remain visible on the shroud today.

In 1578, the shroud was again moved -- to the Cathedral of Saint John the Baptist in the city of Turin -- which later became part of Italy. It has remained there ever since, with the exception of World War II, when it was relocated to protect it from American bombardment. There was another fire in 1997 which required the shroud to be saved (Satanic arson, I bet).

Going on seven centuries now, the debate about its authenticity continues -- especially since an accidental discovery in 1898. That year, an Italian photographer was shocked to discover that the negative image of the shroud yielded a much clearer positive (possibly indicating that the original image itself is the photographic negative). Ever since, both deniers and believers have sought to bolster their arguments with intensive scientific studies utilizing forensic technologies not available in centuries gone by.

Picture
 
Picture
 
1. A portrait of the unfolded shroud from 1578 -- when it was first brought to Turin. // 2. Cautious Clement wasn't quite buying it -- and in fact, the Catholic Church has always taken a surprisingly objective and non-dogmatic position regarding the question of authenticity.

 In 2019, it required a lawsuit and a court-order for a team of secular Oxford scientists to finally access the original 1988 data compiled by an earlier team of scientists whose work led to the publication of a much-publicized "debunking" article in the journal, Nature. After the British Museum was forced to release the data, the Oxford team scientifically ruled out the 1988 findings.

The carbon-dating "debunk" of 1988 turned out to be hasty (if not rigged) conclusion based on contaminated and repaired (from the 1592 fire) samples of the cloth. We have learned of many cases of erroneous carbon-dating -- such as a known 1000-year old Viking artifact dating back only to the 1980s.

Picture
 
Picture
A hero smashed the thick encasement as fire burned all around him.
Picture
 
In addition to the 1352 fire which damaged the shroud, there was another horrible FIVE HOUR fire which -- were it not for the heroic efforts of an Italian firefighter -- would have destroyed the cloth in 1997. 
 
 
Picture
NY TIMES / 1997
Picture
 
Picture

 

Teaser Image
jesus grave

Jesus Grave Site

Jesus Grave Site

 
Jesus Grave Site

In What Location is Jesus Buried???

Christ, who escaped the crucifixion, went through the ups and downs of travel, and again came to Japan. He settled right here in what is now called Herai Village, and died at the age of 106. On this holy ground, there is dedicated a burial mound on the right to deity Christ, and a grave on the left to deity his brother Isukiri.

The Jesus linage lives on.  Jesus married a Japanese woman and fathered three daughters.

 

jesus grave
Jesus’ Grave

Jesus Christ did not die on the cross at Golgotha. Instead his brother, Isukiri was his place on the cross (by mistake), while Jesus fled across Siberia to Mutsu Province, in northern Japan. Once in Japan, he became a rice farmer, married, and raised a family with three daughters near what is now Shingō. While in Japan, it is asserted that he traveled, learned, and eventually died at the age of 106. His body was exposed on a hilltop for four years. According to the customs of the time, Jesus’ bones were collected, bundled, and buried in the mound purported to be the grave of Jesus Christ.

tomb street sign

stairs to Jesus tomb

Jesus' brother tomb
Jesus' Brothers Grave

tomb plaque

Hebrew plaque

 

No No, Not Japan ... Jesus' Grave is in India !!!

 

Rozabal ... India to be exact.

jesus shrine

jesus in kashmirRozabal shrine

shrine entrance

jesus tomb

feet prints of jesus

jesus kissed

 

No, No. Not in India ... Jesus is buried in Jerusalem ...

 

             ... but in which of the three Jerusalem  tombs???

 

holy spulchre
Church of the Holy Sepulchre
garden tombtomb
Garden Tomb
 
talpiot tomb
Talpiot Tomb

 

 
Teaser Image
converting others

Converting Others

Converting Others

 
Converting Others

Converting from One Dumb Religion to Another Dumb Religion

converting
Muslim who has Converted to Christianity

One big dummy converting from one stupid fantasy to another stupid fantasy. 

Muslims converting
Wave of Muslim converting to Christianity
China converting
China converting


People would rather emotionally believe a fantasy than use their brain to think and investigate.

Teaser Image
original sin

Original Sin

Original Sin

 
Original Sin

Lyon basilica

Lyon Basilica – Lyon, France

ORIGINAL SIN? NICE IMAGINATION CHRISTIANS

Only idol worshiping Christians could come up with this one; automatic guilt.

The first indication of such a concept as “Original Sin” was in the 2nd century by Irenaeus, from the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Lyon, in France.

The Christians claim that Adam is accountable as having brought death into the world by eating the forbidden fruit.  Thus all of his offspring are responsible for his wrong doing.

The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.    Ez 18:20

And the Lord smelled a sweet savour; and the Lord said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man’s sake; for the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more everything living, as I have done.    Genesis 8:21

And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.    Genesis 6:5-8,

The Bible states that God recognizes that man inherently has evil imaginations.  However it is clear that Adam’s sins are his alone.

Death by Sin

And where does it say that Adam brought about death? It says it In the Christian New Testament of course.  I guess all the dinosaurs didn’t die.  And i guess all the animal also inherited death from Adam also.

Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:    Romans 5:12

I can see the writer was no Jack London (the Greek gospel writer Paul of course).

Right after that verse Paul states,

for sin indeed was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not counted where there is no law.    Romans 5:13

The Christians have to call it the “word of God” otherwise people will start thinking about what the text says.

original siin

Cursed Ground

God cursed the ground, and Adam was to struggle in his labors because the ground was cursed.

To Adam he said, “Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat from it,’

“Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat food from it all the days of your life.

18 It will produce thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the plants of the field.

19 By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return.”     Genesis  :17-19

And where does it say that Adam brought about death? In the Christian New Testament they claim death wasn’t around until Adam sinned (ate the fruit).  I guess only the animals died and not man???

The Talmud is clear that the this cursing of the ground was later lifted.

Christians don’t want to read and think.  They just want to “believe” in whatever a preacher imagines (evil imaginings).